Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” is a landmark work of literature of the 19th century, touching on both acute social and many philosophical problems, remaining relevant and interesting to the modern reader. The ideological meaning of the novel “Oblomov” is based on the opposition of an active, new social and personal principle with an outdated, passive and degrading one. In the work, the author reveals these principles on several existential levels, therefore, to fully understand the meaning of the work, a detailed consideration of each of them is required.
Social meaning of the novel
In the novel “Oblomov,” Goncharov first introduced the concept of “Oblomovism” as a generalized name for outdated patriarchal-landlord foundations, personal degradation, and the vital stagnation of an entire social layer of Russian philistinism, unwilling to accept new social trends and norms. The author examined this phenomenon using the example of the main character of the novel, Oblomov, whose childhood was spent in distant Oblomovka, where everyone lived quietly, lazily, with little interest in anything and caring almost nothing. The hero's native village becomes the embodiment of the ideals of Russian old-time society - a kind of hedonistic idyll, a “preserved paradise” where there is no need to study, work or develop.
Portraying Oblomov as a “superfluous man,” Goncharov, unlike Griboyedov and Pushkin, whose characters of this type were ahead of society, introduces into the narrative a hero who lags behind society, living in the distant past. The active, active, educated environment oppresses Oblomov - the ideals of Stolz with his work for the sake of work are alien to him, even his beloved Olga is ahead of Ilya Ilyich, approaching everything from a practical side. Stolts, Olga, Tarantyev, Mukhoyarov, and other acquaintances of Oblomov are representatives of a new, “urban” personality type. They are more practitioners than theorists, they do not dream, but do, create new things - some by working honestly, others by deception.
Goncharov condemns “Oblomovism” with its gravitation towards the past, laziness, apathy and complete spiritual withering away of the individual, when a person essentially becomes a “plant” lying on the sofa around the clock. However, Goncharov also portrays the images of modern, new people as ambiguous - they do not have the peace of mind and inner poetry that Oblomov had (remember that Stolz only found this peace while relaxing with a friend, and the already married Olga is sad about something distant and is afraid to dream , making excuses to her husband).
At the end of the work, Goncharov does not make a definite conclusion about who is right - the practitioner Stolz or the dreamer Oblomov. However, the reader understands that it was precisely because of “Oblomovism,” as a phenomenon that is sharply negative and has long since become obsolete, that Ilya Ilyich “disappeared.” That is why the social meaning of Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” is the need for constant development and movement - both in the continuous construction and creation of the surrounding world, and in working on the development of one’s own personality.
The meaning of the title of the work
The meaning of the title of the novel “Oblomov” is closely related to the main theme of the work - it was named after the surname of the main character Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, and is also associated with the social phenomenon “Oblomovism” described in the novel. The etymology of the name is interpreted differently by researchers. Thus, the most common version is that the word “Oblomov” comes from the words “Oblomok”, “break off”, “break”, denoting the state of mental and social breakdown of the landowner nobility, when it found itself in a borderline state between the desire to preserve old traditions and foundations and the need to change according to the requirements of the era, from a creative person to a practical person.
In addition, there is a version about the connection of the title with the Old Slavonic root “oblo” - “round”, which corresponds to the description of the hero - his “rounded” appearance and his quiet, calm character “without sharp corners”. However, regardless of the interpretation of the title of the work, it points to the central storyline of the novel - the life of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov.
The meaning of Oblomovka in the novel
From the plot of the novel “Oblomov,” the reader from the very beginning learns many facts about Oblomovka, about what a wonderful place it is, how easy and good it was for the hero and how important it is for Oblomov to return there. However, throughout the entire narrative, events never take us to the village, which makes it a truly mythical, fairy-tale place. Picturesque nature, gentle hills, a calm river, a hut on the edge of a ravine, which the visitor needs to ask to stand “with his back to the forest, and his front to it” in order to enter - even in the newspapers there was never a mention of Oblomovka. The inhabitants of Oblomovka did not care about any passions - they were completely cut off from the world, they spent their lives in boredom and tranquility, based on constant rituals.
Oblomov's childhood was spent in love, his parents constantly spoiled Ilya, indulging all his desires. However, Oblomov was particularly impressed by the stories of his nanny, who read to him about mythical heroes and fairy-tale heroes, closely linking his native village with folklore in the hero’s memory. For Ilya Ilyich, Oblomovka is a distant dream, an ideal comparable, perhaps, to the beautiful ladies of medieval knights who glorified wives who were sometimes never seen. In addition, the village is also a way to escape from reality, a kind of half-imagined place where the hero can forget about reality and be himself - lazy, apathetic, completely calm and renounced from the world around him.
The meaning of Oblomov's life in the novel
Oblomov’s whole life is connected only with that distant, quiet and harmonious Oblomovka, however, the mythical estate exists only in the memories and dreams of the hero - pictures from the past never come to him in a cheerful state, his native village appears before him as some kind of distant vision, in its own way unattainable , like any mythical city. Ilya Ilyich is in every possible way opposed to the real perception of his native Oblomovka - he still does not plan the future estate, he delays for a long time in responding to the headman’s letter, and in a dream he does not seem to notice the disrepair of the house - a crooked gate, a sagging roof, a shaky porch, a neglected garden. And he really doesn’t want to go there - Oblomov is afraid that when he sees the dilapidated, ruined Oblomovka, which has nothing in common with his dreams and memories, he will lose his last illusions, which he clings to with all his might and for which he lives.
The only thing that brings complete happiness to Oblomov is dreams and illusions. He is afraid of real life, afraid of marriage, which he has dreamed of many times, afraid of breaking himself and becoming someone else. Wrapping himself in an old robe and continuing to lie on the bed, he “preserves” himself in a state of “Oblomovism” - in general, the robe in the work is, as it were, part of that mythical world that returns the hero to a state of laziness and extinction.
The meaning of the hero's life in Oblomov's novel comes down to gradual dying - both moral and mental, and physical, for the sake of maintaining his own illusions. The hero does not want to say goodbye to the past so much that he is ready to sacrifice a full life, the opportunity to feel every moment and recognize every feeling for the sake of mythical ideals and dreams.
Conclusion
In the novel “Oblomov,” Goncharov depicted the tragic story of the decline of a person for whom the illusory past became more important than the multifaceted and beautiful present - friendship, love, social well-being. The meaning of the work indicates that it is important not to stand still, indulging oneself in illusions, but to always strive forward, expanding the boundaries of one’s own “comfort zone.”
Work test
The novel “Oblomov” is part of a kind of trilogy by I.A. Goncharov, dedicated to the writer’s thoughts about the fate of contemporary Russia and the Russian people. In “Oblomov,” the author shows a turning point in the life of the country, when patriarchal Rus' is replaced by Europeanized, capitalist Russia.
How will this affect the Russian mentality, will the country gain or lose from this, what will happen to Russian culture and Russian people? Goncharov tries to comprehend these issues, reflecting all aspects of his contemporary life.
There are many tragic moments in the novel. And, first of all, the conflict here is tragic - between patriarchal Russia and capitalist Russia.
Rus' in the person of Oblomov is kindness, hospitality, sincerity, but also inertia, laziness, fear of change. The “new” Russia, represented by Stolz and partly by Olga Ilyinskaya, is business acumen, energy, rationality, but also spiritual coldness, cynicism, even heartlessness.
We see that in his youth Ilya Ilyich tried to “find himself” - while studying at the university, the hero was intensely thinking about what he was destined for, what field was destined for him. Sciences did not inspire Oblomov; he did not see any practical use in them. Studying the works of philosophers and natural scientists, the hero was constantly tormented by the thought: “When will I live?”
As a result, “having betrayed his service and society, he began to solve the problem of existence differently, thought about his purpose and finally discovered that the horizon of his activity and life lies within himself. He realized that he had inherited family happiness and caring for the estate.”
But even here failure awaited Oblomov, since an inert mind, laziness and fear of action, of life itself did not allow him to carry out his intentions. We see how Ilya Ilyich lies on the sofa all day long, trying to start a plan for reforms on the estate or at least solve pressing matters related to it, but... he cannot. No force can force Ilya Ilyich to take action!
Why is there so much contradiction in this hero, such exaggerated apathy and laziness? The answer lies in “Oblomov’s Dream,” which tells about the childhood of Ilya Ilyich and reveals the origins of his character.
Oblomov’s ideal is a patriarchal way of life: quiet, measured, cozy, lazy. In such a model of the world, a person does not need to care about his existence, worry about anything - everything here is provided to him by the sovereign, the serfs and the Lord God. The Oblomovites were content with the small joys of their limited little world, their “Arcadia,” and did not want anything more. All the signs of another, “big and cold” life frightened them.
Little Ilyusha absorbed everything positive that was in Oblomovka, but also all the shortcomings of that life. We understand that the hero is completely unsuited to an adult, independent, responsible life, a life full of worries, worries, and changes. He tries to isolate himself from everything with his cozy robe. Fear conquers all other feelings and instincts in Oblomov. And this, in my opinion, is the tragedy of this character.
The hero's life also ends sadly - he dies from a second blow caused by gluttony and laziness. And this death is all the more sad because Oblomov’s nature concealed within itself many talents, warmth, generosity, and love. But only a few close to the hero were able to feel this: Stolz, Olga Ilyinskaya, perhaps Oblomov’s son.
The fate of Oblomov’s servant Zakhar, who did not see himself without his master, is also tragic. Accustomed to thinking in terms of “master - serf,” this man was unable to recover from Oblomov’s death. He turned into a beggar, half-blind old man living on alms, but until the end of his life he looked after his owner’s grave.
Thus, Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” is a deep socio-psychological work. In my opinion, the character and fate of the main character of this work are tragic, and the conflict of the novel is also tragic - an insoluble contradiction between the old and the new, the original and the coming. However, all this is “flavored” in “Oblomov” with a lot of funny things, which are “woven” into the characters’ characters and make them unique, alive, and significant.
Goncharov's novel "Oblomov" makes the reader think about the meaning of life. Who is Ilya Ilyich Oblomov? An ordinary lazy person or a person who sees absolutely no meaning in life? The image of Oblomov deserves close attention, if only in order to form a comprehensive opinion about this man.
Oblomov's life is empty and meaningless. Can its existence be called life? Ilya Ilyich has absolutely no aspirations; every day of his is similar to the previous one. He remains in his vegetative existence, without being distracted by anything.
Oblomov resists in every possible way those who try to lift him from his cozy sofa. The outside world seems alien and hostile to Oblomov. Oblomov is neither sick nor disappointed in life. It’s just convenient for him to live the way he lives - in complete inaction. He lies all day in his robe made of Persian cloth. Moreover, “lying down for Ilya Ilyich was neither a necessity, like that of a sick person or like a person who wants to sleep, nor an accident, like that of someone who is tired, nor a pleasure, like that of a lazy person: it was his normal state.”
How can inaction be a normal human condition? Human life is a constant movement, a constant search for something new, new impressions, pleasures, a constant desire to do something, change something. Can declare that human life is meaningless in its essence. One person is not able to change the world, and not everyone manages to accomplish something significant. But the point is not at all to make a great discovery or change the world.
Each person has a certain need to cope with everyday affairs. Without this fulfillment, all life fades, completely losing all meaning. It is enough to recall Ilcha Ilyich’s untidy and neglected room to state that a self-respecting person should not allow this to happen. “The room where Ilya Ilyich was lying seemed at first glance to be beautifully decorated... But the experienced eye of a man with pure taste, with one quick glance at everything that was there, would have read the desire only to somehow observe the dekorum of inevitable decency, just to get rid of them... Along the walls, approximately paintings, cobwebs saturated with dust were molded in the form of festoons; mirrors, instead of reflecting objects, could serve more as tablets for writing on them, in the dust, some notes for memory... The carpets were stained. There was a forgotten towel on the sofa; On rare mornings there was not a plate with a salt shaker and a gnawed bone on the table that had not been cleared away from yesterday’s dinner, and there were no bread crumbs lying around.”
Such a lengthy quotation allows us to see the situation in which abides Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. It would seem, what influence can a room have on him? But nevertheless, the lack of proper attention to one’s home does not characterize a person from the best side. Ilya Ilyich readily reproaches Zakhar for laziness and sloppiness. And he, in turn, objects: regarding dust and dirt - “why clean it up if it accumulates again” and that he did not invent bedbugs and cockroaches, everyone has them. Ilya Ilyich cannot force his own servant to work further; is he capable of significant changes in his native village of Oblomovka? Of course not. And yet, Oblomov, lying on the sofa, constantly makes rosy plans for reconstruction in the village. All of Oblomov’s dreams and plans are completely divorced from life; he cannot direct them towards something concrete, real. Can Oblomov be called a dreamer? Of course you can. All of Ilya Ilyich’s dreams warm his soul, but not one is at least somehow close to life.
It’s interesting to watch Oblomov himself when he abides in a state of reverie: “The thought walked like a free bird across the face, fluttered in the eyes, sat on half-open lips, hid in the folds of the forehead, then completely disappeared, and then an even light of carelessness glowed throughout the face...”
There is no doubt that Oblomov is in fact a surprisingly carefree person. He does not think about his own well-being; he is satisfied with absolutely everything. And this is exactly what makes him happy. In my opinion, it cannot be denied that Oblomov is a truly happy person. He does not accept fuss; secular society tires him. He lives in his own world, and, despite his laziness and indifference to the life around him, his inner world is quite rich. Oblomov is interested in art, he appreciates good people.
This creates a dual picture. On the one hand, Oblomov can be called a happy person because happiness is, first of all, harmony with oneself and with the world around us. And Oblomov’s life is very harmonious. He doesn’t regret anything, doesn’t worry about what he can’t do. He is happy with his life, quite happy with himself.
On the other hand, it is quite fair to call Oblomov an unhappy person. His life is empty, nothing pleases him, he is constantly half asleep. He is not disturbed by vivid feelings and experiences, he does not even show any emotions.
Ilya Ilyich, in essence, is absolutely helpless. He is so accustomed to his way of life that he cannot even imagine himself in a different situation. Oblomov is attached to his servant Zakhar. And this habit also reveals his traits such as conservatism and reluctance to change anything. “Just as Ilya Ilyich could neither get up, nor go to bed, nor be combed and put on shoes, nor have dinner without Zakhar’s help, so Zakhar could not imagine another master, besides Ilcha Ilyich, another existence, how to dress him, feed him, be rude to him, to dissemble, lie and at the same time inwardly reverence him."
Oblomov is a type typical of his time. He has absolute indifference to everything that surrounds him. Oblomov is inert and apathetic, he does not change his life, because it completely suits him. But if you think about it, why does she suit him? First of all, Oblomov is satisfied with absolutely everything precisely because he does not know any other life. A stormy flow of life passes by him, a series of affairs that those around him undertake, love passes by, the possibility of family happiness, the opportunity to make a brilliant career, and he still lies and lies on his sofa, immersed in his transcendental dreams.
Oblomov's tragedy lies precisely in this reluctance to look beyond the narrow boundaries of his inner world in order to see the big and beautiful outside world. Being absorbed in yourself, in your thoughts and dreams, is certainly a good quality. But at the same time it can be called unpromising and useless. Oblomov is gradually descending, his appearance speaks for itself. He doesn't care what he looks like or what impression he makes on others. He doesn't care what happened yesterday and what will happen tomorrow. It is only important for him that there is a cozy sofa, so that no one disturbs him or forces him to do anything.
Constantly remaining inactive, a person sinks and degrades. This is exactly what happens in Oblomov’s life. There is gradually nothing left in his life that could be called the word “meaning”. The complete meaninglessness of existence is exactly what we see in the novel. Gradually all desire to do something disappears, and the person goes downhill. Goncharov's novel "Oblomov" makes the reader understand how painful life can become if a person does not see any meaning in it.
The novel “Oblomov” is part of a kind of trilogy by I.A. Goncharov, dedicated to the writer’s thoughts about the fate of contemporary Russia and Russian people. In “Oblomov,” the author shows a turning point in the life of the country, when patriarchal Rus' is replaced by Europeanized, capitalist Russia.
How will this affect the Russian mentality, will the country gain or lose from this, what will happen to Russian culture and Russian people? Goncharov tries to comprehend these issues, reflecting all aspects of his contemporary life.
There are many tragic moments in the novel. And, first of all, the conflict here is tragic - between patriarchal Russia and capitalist Russia.
Rus' in the person of Oblomov is kindness, hospitality, sincerity, but also inertia, laziness, fear of change. The “new” Russia, represented by Stolz and partly by Olga Ilyinskaya, is business acumen, energy, rationality, but also spiritual coldness, cynicism, even heartlessness.
We see that in his youth Ilya Ilyich tried to “find himself” - while studying at the university, the hero was intensely thinking about what he was destined for, what field was destined for him. Sciences did not inspire Oblomov; he did not see any practical use in them. Studying the works of philosophers and natural scientists, the hero was constantly tormented by the thought: “When will I live?”
As a result, “having betrayed his service and society, he began to solve the problem of existence differently, thought about his purpose and finally discovered that the horizon of his activity and life lies within himself. He realized that he had inherited family happiness and caring for the estate.”
But even here failure awaited Oblomov, since an inert mind, laziness and fear of action, of life itself did not allow him to carry out his intentions. We see how Ilya Ilyich lies on the sofa all day long, trying to start a plan for reforms on the estate or at least solve pressing matters related to it, but... he cannot. No force can force Ilya Ilyich to take action!
Why is there so much contradiction in this hero, such exaggerated apathy and laziness? The answer lies in “Oblomov’s Dream,” which tells about the childhood of Ilya Ilyich and reveals the origins of his character.
Oblomov’s ideal is a patriarchal way of life: quiet, measured, cozy, lazy. In such a model of the world, a person does not need to worry about his existence, worry about anything - everything here is provided to him by the sovereign, the serfs and the Lord God. The Oblomovites were content with the small joys of their limited world, their “Arcadia,” and did not want anything more. All the signs of another, “big and cold” life frightened them.
Little Ilyusha absorbed everything positive that was in Oblomovka, but also all the shortcomings of that life. We understand that the hero is completely unsuited to an adult, independent, responsible life, a life full of worries, worries, and changes. He tries to isolate himself from everything with his cozy robe. Fear conquers all other feelings and instincts in Oblomov. And this, in my opinion, is the tragedy of this character.
The hero's life also ends sadly - he dies from a second blow caused by gluttony and laziness. And this death is all the more sad because Oblomov’s nature concealed within itself many talents, warmth, generosity, and love. But only a few close to the hero were able to feel this: Stolz, Olga Ilyinskaya, perhaps Oblomov’s son.
The fate of Oblomov’s servant Zakhar, who did not see himself without his master, is also tragic. Accustomed to thinking in terms of “master - serf,” this man was unable to recover from Oblomov’s death. He turned into a beggar, half-blind old man living on alms, but until the end of his life he looked after his owner’s grave.
Thus, Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” is a deep socio-psychological work. In my opinion, the character and fate of the main character of this work are tragic, and the conflict of the novel is also tragic - an insoluble contradiction between the old and the new, the original and the coming. However, all this is “flavored” in “Oblomov” with a lot of funny things, which are “woven” into the characters’ characters and make them unique, alive, and significant.
Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” makes the reader think about the meaning of life. Who is Ilya Ilyich Oblomov? An ordinary lazy person or a person who sees absolutely no meaning in life? The image of Oblomov deserves close attention, if only in order to form a comprehensive opinion about this man.
Oblomov's life is empty and meaningless. Can its existence be called life? Ilya Ilyich has absolutely no aspirations; every day of his is similar to the previous one. He remains in his vegetative existence, without being distracted by anything.
Oblomov resists in every possible way those who try to lift him from his cozy sofa. The outside world seems alien and hostile to Oblomov. Oblomov is neither sick nor disappointed in life. It’s just convenient for him to live the way he lives - in complete inaction. He lies all day in his robe made of Persian cloth. Moreover, “lying down for Ilya Ilyich was neither a necessity, like that of a sick person or like a person who wants to sleep, nor an accident, like that of someone who is tired, nor a pleasure, like that of a lazy person: it was his normal state.”
How can inaction be a normal human condition? Human life is a constant movement, a constant search for something new, new impressions, pleasures, a constant desire to do something, change something. We can say that human life is meaningless in its essence. One person is not able to change the world, and not everyone manages to accomplish something significant. But the point is not at all to make a great discovery or change the world.
Each person has a certain need to cope with everyday affairs. Without this fulfillment, all life fades, completely losing all meaning. It is enough to recall Ilchi Ilyich’s untidy and neglected room to state that a self-respecting person should not allow this to happen. “The room where Ilya Ilyich was lying seemed at first glance to be beautifully decorated... But the experienced eye of a man with pure taste, with one quick glance at everything that was there, would have read the desire only to somehow observe the dekorum of inevitable decency, just to get rid of them... On the walls, near the paintings, cobwebs, saturated with dust, were molded in the form of festoons; mirrors, instead of reflecting objects, could serve more as tablets for writing on them, in the dust, some notes for memory... The carpets were stained. There was a forgotten towel on the sofa; On rare mornings there was not a plate with a salt shaker and a gnawed bone on the table that had not been cleared away from yesterday’s dinner, and there were no bread crumbs lying around.”
Such a lengthy quote allows you to see the situation in which Ilya Ilyich Oblomov finds himself. It would seem, what influence can a room have on him? But nevertheless, the lack of proper attention to one’s home does not characterize a person from the best side. Ilya Ilyich readily reproaches Zakhar for laziness and sloppiness. And he, in turn, objects: regarding dust and dirt - “why clean it up if it accumulates again” and that he did not invent bedbugs and cockroaches, everyone has them.
Ilya Ilyich cannot even force his own servant to work; is he capable of significant changes in his native village of Oblomovka? Of course not. And yet, Oblomov, lying on the sofa, constantly makes rosy plans for reconstruction in the village. All of Oblomov’s dreams and plans are completely divorced from life; he cannot direct them towards something concrete, real. Is it possible to call Oblomov a dreamer? Of course, please. All of Ilya Ilyich’s dreams warm his soul, but not one is at least somehow close to life.
It is interesting to observe Oblomov himself when he is in a state of reverie: “The thought walked like a free bird across his face, fluttered in his eyes, sat on his half-open lips, hid in the folds of his forehead, then completely disappeared, and then an even light of carelessness glowed throughout his face... ."
There is no doubt that Oblomov is in fact a surprisingly carefree person. He does not think about his own well-being; he is satisfied with absolutely everything. And this is exactly what makes him happy. In my opinion, it cannot be denied that Oblomov is a truly happy person. He does not accept fuss; secular society tires him. He lives in his own world, and, despite his laziness and indifference to the life around him, his inner world is quite rich. Oblomov is interested in art, he appreciates good people.
The result is a dual picture. On the one hand, Oblomov can be called a happy person. Because happiness is, first of all, harmony with yourself and with the world around you. And Oblomov’s life is very harmonious. He doesn’t regret anything, doesn’t worry about what he can’t do. He is happy with his life, quite happy with himself.
On the other hand, it is quite fair to call Oblomov an unhappy person. His life is empty, nothing pleases him, he is constantly half asleep. He is not disturbed by vivid feelings and experiences, he does not even show any emotions.
Ilya Ilyich, in essence, is absolutely helpless. He is so accustomed to his way of life that he cannot even imagine himself in a different situation. Oblomov is attached to his servant Zakhar. And this habit also reveals his traits such as conservatism and reluctance to change anything. “Just as Ilya Ilyich could neither get up, nor go to bed, nor be combed and put on shoes, nor have dinner without Zakhar’s help, so Zakhar could not imagine another master, besides Ilcha Ilyich, another existence, how to dress him, feed him, be rude to him, to dissemble, lie and at the same time inwardly reverence him.”
Oblomov is a type typical of his time. He has absolute indifference to everything that surrounds him. Oblomov is inert and apathetic, he does not change his life, because it completely suits him. But if you think about it, why does she suit him? First of all, Oblomov is satisfied with absolutely everything precisely because he does not know any other life. A stormy flow of life passes by him, a series of affairs that those around him undertake, love passes by, the possibility of family happiness, the opportunity to make a brilliant career, and he still lies and lies on his sofa, immersed in his transcendental dreams.
Oblomov's tragedy lies precisely in this reluctance to look beyond the narrow boundaries of his inner world in order to see the big and beautiful outside world. Being absorbed in yourself, in your thoughts and dreams, is certainly a good quality. But at the same time it can be called unpromising and useless. Oblomov is gradually descending, his appearance speaks for itself. He doesn't care what he looks like or what impression he makes on others. He doesn't care what happened yesterday and what will happen tomorrow. It is only important for him that there is a cozy sofa, so that no one disturbs him or forces him to do anything.
Constantly remaining inactive, a person sinks and degrades. This is exactly what happens in Oblomov’s life. There is gradually nothing left in his life that could be called the word “meaning.” The complete meaninglessness of existence is exactly what we see in the novel. Gradually all desire to do something disappears, and the person goes downhill. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” makes the reader understand how painful life can become if a person does not see any meaning in it.
