Works on literature: The meaning of the title of the story by A. I. Kuprin "Duel" The title of the story by A. I. Kuprin correctly conveys the meaning of the drama that has played out in it, immediately defines an internal conflict that is not yet known to the reader. That is, a duel means not only the duel described at the end of the story, but also all the events that occur with the main characters. The action of the book takes place at a time when fights between officers have just been officially allowed. Naturally, this topic is being actively discussed in the garrison. For the first time, She is seriously touched upon in a conversation between Shurochka Nikolaeva and Romashov. Shurochka, a beautiful, charming, intelligent, educated woman, speaks of duels as some kind of necessary phenomenon. The officer, she argues, must risk himself. Insult can only be washed away with blood.
After all, officers, says Shurochka, were created for war. Their essential qualities should be "courage, pride, the ability not to blink before death." Such qualities in peacetime can only manifest themselves in duels. Not only Shurochka, the wife of an officer, talks about fights with such vehemence. This is the opinion of most of the men in the garrison.
Romashov, with bewilderment and amazement, listens to such speeches from the lips of a charming woman. Many officers are attracted by fights, war, bloodshed. They speak with regret of the old wars they never participated in. They enthusiastically describe fires, murders, massacres, the cries of children, the cries of women, and even savor these details. Romashov's life in the regiment is an eternal duel with himself and with officer prejudices. He is not the same as his comrades, he has other life aspirations. Arriving in the regiment, Romashov dreamed of "valor, exploits, glory."
He idealized the officers, believing that these people are noble, generous, honest. And what did he find in the garrison? Officers lead a gray, hopeless existence. Their monotonous service does not bring them any satisfaction. They take revenge on soldiers who are not considered human, beat them until they bleed, until their teeth fly out.
The rank and file do not dare to raise their heads, because they do not have the right to argue with their superiors. Therefore, arbitrariness reigns in the army: the rank and file are becoming more and more depersonalized, the superiors are becoming more and more raging. This is how the service goes from day to day. In the evenings, not knowing what to do, the officers gather, play cards and arrange senseless revels. "From nothing to do" novels are started, far-fetched passions boil. Officers' wives are no different from their husbands. The same grayness, lack of education, unwillingness to see anything around him, the game of secularism. Against this background, Shurochka, of course, stands out for her attractiveness, freshness, spontaneity, ardor, desire to escape somewhere into another world.
Others do not seek to change their existence, everyone is used to it and hardly imagine anything else. Of course, there are exceptions. These people understand what kind of dirt they live in, but they cannot do anything. The same Nazansky - an interesting, thinking person - drank himself and ruined himself, seeing no other way. Kuprin protested in his book against the order existing in the army, which he knew firsthand. Romashov is drawn into this atmosphere (and what else is there to do?), begins to lead the same lifestyle as everyone else.
However, he feels much more subtle and thinks more confidently. He is more and more horrified by the wild, hopeless existence in the garrison, the unfair, brutal treatment of soldiers, unrestrained drunkenness, gossip, and petty intrigues. He dreams of escaping from this, doing something else. He does not allow himself to be drawn into the quagmire of licentiousness and thoughtlessness, he struggles with everything bad in himself. He succeeds because he is capable of deep, sincere feelings. He is imbued with sympathy, moreover - respect - for the soldiers. He loves Shurochka with all his heart, not allowing himself to doubt that she is the best of women. He is burdened by the company of other officers.
The whole book is a series of petty clashes between Romashov and the people around him. Such clashes are inevitable, since the difference between Lieutenant Romashov and others is striking. He constantly enters into conflicts with someone, being by nature a person not in conflict, but good-natured, always ready to listen to the opinion of another. All these minor skirmishes lead to one main one - a duel between Romashov and Nikolaev. In general, the duel was predetermined from the very beginning. Romashov loved Nikolaev's wife, in addition, and she answered him, if not with love, but at least with sympathy, affection. Nikolaev from the very beginning does not accept Romashov. Perhaps, in addition to personal reasons, the fact that Romashov, taking part in the life of the regiment, is, as it were, on the outskirts, a little higher than the rest, plays a role here.
Therefore, sooner or later the duel had to take place. The word "duel" in relation to the event that took place is perhaps not entirely appropriate, since it was not a fair battle between two officers. Shurochka, so dearly loved by Romashov, assured him that everything had been agreed in advance and no one would be injured. At the same time, she made the reservation that she was saying goodbye to him forever, but he, like all lovers, was blind. How could a gullible, romantic second lieutenant assume that the woman he loves is so cold, prudent and treacherous? And he died without knowing happy love, without fulfilling his cherished dream of leaving the service and devoting himself to a more worthy occupation.
The duel between Romashov and the outside world was not in favor of the dreamy second lieutenant. The story "Duel", created by Kuprin during the Russo-Japanese War and in the atmosphere of the rise of the Russian revolutionary movement, caused a huge public outcry, since it was in this relatively small work that the writer managed to expose and flaunt all those negative aspects of life, inviolable and deeply revered military caste, which has always been considered the advanced part of the autocratic Russian state. Thus, with his "Duel" Kuprin dealt a stunning blow not only to the wild army mores, but to all the orders of tsarist Russia. By the way, for reading the story in Sevastopol, Kuprin was imprisoned, and then expelled from the Crimea.
But the problematic of the work goes far beyond the traditional military story. In "Duel" the author touches upon topical issues of that time about the reasons for the inequality of people in society, highlighting the problem of the relationship between the individual and society, the intelligentsia and the people, and looking for ways to free a person from spiritual oppression, pointing out the insignificance and great harm of social influence on the formation personality. In the center of the story is the fate of the honest and noble Russian officer Romashov (whose figure expressed many of the features of the author himself), who finds himself in the conditions of army barracks life, where he goes through a harsh school, feeling all the wrongness of human relationships. As the reason for the tragedy of the fate of the protagonist, we see the spiritual impassability of the intelligentsia, which has become detached from the people.
Is unhappy love for Shurochka the cause of the spiritual and physical death of the morally pure Romashov and Nazansky? Of course not. The personal tragedy in the lives of these heroes only accelerates the sad ending. No more than fifty pages are given directly to the barracks life in the story. These are two scenes depicting the everyday life of the regiment, a large review scene by the corps commander. But episodes showing the relationship between Romashov and his batman Gainan, episodes of conversations with the soldier Khlebnikov, sympathy for a Tatar who does not understand the Russian language are closely connected with them. It is here that the question of the attitude of the intelligentsia to the people is raised. The author shows the musty world of army provincial life. Let us recall how, at the very beginning of the story, Commander Shulgovich subjects Romashov to house arrest for "misunderstanding military discipline." The hero feels humiliated, and his youthful vanity draws sweet pictures of revenge in his imagination: here he is graduating from the academy, becoming a brilliant officer, and Shulgovich fawns over him, whom he teaches how to maneuver.
What is the meaning of the title of the story by A. I. Kuprin "Duel"?
Sample essay text
When you close the last page of Kuprin's story "Duel", there is a feeling of absurdity, injustice of what happened. The dry lines of the report in a clerical way accurately and dispassionately set out the circumstances of the death of Lieutenant Romashov, who died as a result of a duel with Lieutenant Nikolaev. The life of a young, pure and honest person ends simply and casually.
The external outline of the story seems to explain the reason for this tragedy. This is Yuri Alekseevich's love for a married woman, Shurochka Nikolaeva, which caused her husband's legitimate and understandable jealousy and his desire to protect his desecrated honor. But this love is mixed with the meanness and selfish calculation of Shurochka, who was not ashamed to conclude a cynical deal with a man in love with her, in which his life became the stake. In addition, it seems that the death of Romashov is predetermined by the events that take place in the story. This is facilitated by the general atmosphere of cruelty, violence, impunity that characterizes the officer environment.
This means that the word "duel" is an expression of the conflict between universal human moral norms and the lawlessness that is going on in the army.
The young lieutenant Romashov arrives at his duty station with the hope of finding his calling here, meeting honest, courageous people who will accept him into their friendly officer family. The author does not idealize his hero at all. He is, as they say, an average, even ordinary person with a ridiculous habit of thinking of himself in the third person. But in him, undoubtedly, a healthy, normal beginning is felt, which causes in him a feeling of protest against the surrounding way of army life. At the beginning of the story, this protest is expressed in a timid attempt by Romashov to express his disagreement with the general opinion of his colleagues, who approve of the wild deeds of a drunken cornet who cut into a crowd of Jews, or an officer who shot, “like a dog,” a civilian who dared to reprimand him. But his confused speech about the fact that cultured, decent people still should not attack an unarmed person with a saber evokes only a condescending response, in which poorly hidden contempt for this "fendrik", "institute" comes through. Yuri Alekseevich feels his alienation among colleagues, naively and awkwardly trying to overcome it. He secretly admires the prowess and strength of Bek-Agamalov, trying to become like him. However, innate kindness and conscientiousness make Romashov stand up for a Tatar soldier in front of a formidable colonel. But a simple human explanation that a soldier does not know the Russian language is regarded as a gross violation of military discipline, which turns out to be incompatible with the principles of humanity and humanity.
In general, there are many "cruel" scenes in Kuprin's story, depicting the humiliation of human dignity. They are characteristic primarily of the soldier's environment, among which the distraught, muzzled soldier Khlebnikov stands out, who tried to throw himself under a train in order to put an end to daily torture. Sympathizing with this unfortunate soldier, protecting him, Romashov nevertheless cannot save him. The meeting with Khlebnikov makes him feel even more like an outcast among the officers.
In the representation of the hero, a whole scale of humiliation is gradually built up, when the general rudely treats the regiment commander, he, in turn, humiliates the officers, and those - the soldiers. On these submissive, dumb creatures, the officers take out all their anger, longing from the meaninglessness, idiocy of army everyday life and leisure. But the heroes of Kuprin's story are not inveterate scoundrels at all, almost in each of them there are some glimpses of humanity. For example, Colonel Shulgovich, rudely and sharply scolding an officer who squandered government money, immediately helps him. So, in general, good people in the conditions of arbitrariness, violence and unrestrained drunkenness lose their human appearance. This further emphasizes the depth of the moral decline of the officers in the decaying tsarist army.
The image of Romashov is given by the writer in dynamics, development. The author shows in the story the spiritual growth of the hero, which is manifested, for example, in his changed attitude towards the society of officers, which the regiment commander calls "the whole family." Romashov no longer cherishes this family and is ready even now to break out of it and go into reserve. In addition, now he is not timid and confused, as before, but clearly and firmly expresses his convictions: “It is dishonest to beat a soldier. You cannot beat a person who not only cannot answer you, but does not even have the right to raise his hand to his face to defend himself from a blow. He doesn't even dare to turn his head away. It's a shame." If earlier Romashov often found oblivion in drunkenness or in a vulgar connection with Rayechka Peterson, then by the end of the story he reveals firmness and strength of character. Perhaps, in the soul of Yuri Alekseevich, a duel is also taking place, in which ambitious dreams of glory and a military career are fighting with the indignation that seizes him at the sight of senseless cruelty and utter spiritual emptiness that have permeated the entire army.
And in this bloodless duel, a healthy moral principle, a humane desire to protect humiliated, suffering people wins. The growing up of the young hero is combined with his spiritual growth. After all, maturity does not always mean striving for perfection. This is evidenced by the images of officers, people who got used to the oppressive situation, adapted to it. Yes, and sometimes a longing for a different, normal life breaks through in them, which is usually expressed in a surge of anger, irritation, drunken revelry. There is a vicious circle from which there is no way out. In my opinion, the tragedy of Romashov is that, while denying the monotony, idiocy and lack of spirituality of army life, he still does not have sufficient strength to resist it. From this moral impasse, there is only one way out for him - death.
Narrating the fate of his hero, his searches, delusions and insight, the writer shows the social ill-being that covered all spheres of Russian reality at the beginning of the century, but was more clearly and clearly manifested in the army.
Thus, the title of Kuprin's story can be understood as a duel between good and evil, violence and humanism, cynicism and purity. This, in my opinion, is the main meaning of the title of the story by A. I. Kuprin "Duel".
Bibliography
For the preparation of this work, materials from the site were used. http://www.kostyor.ru/
Oct 30 2015
A. I. Kuprin's story "The Duel" was written in 1905 on the basis of factual material - the impressions of the author himself from the army service. The crisis of the Russian army at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century, the order that flourished in it, drill, scuffle - all this explains the defeat of Russia in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905. as a natural result of the current situation. The name of the story - "Duel" - is also not accidental, it has both a literal and figurative meaning. The first, of course, is the actual meaning of the name - the theme of a duel, a duel. Officer duels were allowed shortly before the beginning of the events described, and this was done, apparently, in order to develop and strengthen the sense of military honor in the officers. But, as is often the case, good intentions turned into a farce, window dressing.
Duels often take place without a real reason, and the officers took them as an encouragement for their activities, most often the result of a drunken scandal. Official patriotism, pompous phrases become more important than the essence of what is happening. So, the heroes talk about ensign Krause, who shot two unarmed people in a drunken scandal, but shot himself in the arm under the banner of the regiment and was acquitted by the tribunal. The attitude of the officers to the duel is different, 'but the majority just share such pompous opinions about the "honor of the uniform" and that "only blood can wash away the stain of resentment." If the duel is denied, then, most likely, from practical, purely everyday considerations, as Lieutenant Archakovsky says about this, calling the duel "nonsense", suitable only in the guard, "for various idlers there."
And the voices of the young lieutenant Mikhin, who believes that sometimes the “highest honor” lies in forgiveness, or the main story of Romashov, who does not consider it possible to attack a civilian with a saber, cause ridicule and condemnation from all those present. Formalism and hypocrisy are especially evident at the end of the story, when Romashov faces a court of officer's honor, which should consider his quarrel with Lieutenant Nikolaev, Shurochka's husband. Officers, members of the court, are filled with importance in the role of zealots of officer honor.
They hypocritically ask Romashov about where he was and whether he was drunk, as if they themselves were not present at that scandal and were not just as drunk. Their decision to duel clearly demonstrates window dressing and formalism in matters of military honor, but at the same time ignores the moral problems of the conflict. The report on the duel, on its tragic outcome, ends, outlining the events in dry clerical language.
This is the literal meaning of the name. But this name also has a second plan, deeper and more significant. We are talking about a duel that takes place in the soul of a hero, a duel between an officer and a man, leading Romashov to the decision to leave the army, but not carried out. The hero - Lieutenant Romashov - is the same officer, like many in the regiment, who recently left the school and began his service. He differs from his associates in a softer character, humanistic moods.
He, as already mentioned above, does not approve of armed reprisals against civilians, considering them equal to himself and thereby denying the caste, the chosenness of the army. He treats the soldiers differently, denying violence and not allowing them to be beaten. He has an unusual friendly relationship with his batman, and he pays him sincere gratitude for such mutual understanding. This causes ridicule among senior officers: “We have seen such almonds, do not worry. In a year, if only you are not kicked out of the regiment, you will click on the faces.
But Romashov cannot alone resist this environment. After leaving the school, he dreamed of preparing for the Academy, outlining a strict life program for himself: study, reading, music and languages. But now the purchased books are gathering dust on the shelf, unread newspapers are lying under the table, the lieutenant drinks vodka in the meeting, plays cards, has "a long, dirty and boring connection with the regimental lady."
He tries to get away from reality in his dreams, thinking of himself in the third person, presenting himself either as a reconnaissance hero or as a brilliant military strategist who saved the battle that was already lost, consoling himself for the nitpicking of his superiors. This reflection, the fictional world of fantasies of offended pride, save him for a while. When Romashov dared to object to the colonel, standing up for the soldier, he was placed under house arrest, and here, alone with sad thoughts about life, we see the beginning of the hero's spiritual crisis. Gray color dominates these sensations: "his thoughts were gray as a soldier's cloth."
And he perceives in the same way: “Something cramped, gray and dirty…” Reflecting on his own “I” and “I” of other soldiers, the hero comes to realize the individuality of his own and other people, to thoughts about the denial of violence, to the denial of the need for an army . And when he is called to the colonel, Romashov suddenly feels such dignity in himself, such intransigence towards servility and cowardice, that Colonel Shulgovich also felt this and did not dare to humiliate Romashov.
The next stage of the mental break for the hero was the failure of the regiment at the review, in which Romashov was also guilty. The shame and ridicule of his colleagues lead the hero to thoughts of suicide, but for the first time he is forced to forget about his troubles by someone else's grief - the grief of the downtrodden soldier Khlebnikov. Romashov feels some strange kindred closeness to this man. For the first time he says to Khlebnikov: "My brother!", understanding his state of mind and feeling "guilty pity" in his heart, when "his personal grief" seems "small and trifling." After this "deep mental breakdown" Romashov stopped going to the officers' meeting, drinking, began to retire more, to think about life, about his attitude towards the army and soldiers.
How to change life? How to find your place in it after leaving the army? A large role in these spiritual searches of the hero was played by his colleague Nazansky, a talented, humanistic understanding of life, but, not being able to resist it, became a victim of hard drinking. Thinking about the "three proud vocations of man", which the hero considers science, art and free physical labor, he is increasingly strengthened in dreams of literary work. He attaches great importance to love in a person’s life: without it, Romashov feels boredom, loneliness and “dead emptiness” in his soul.
Talking with Nazansky, he understands even more the importance of the freedom of the human spirit, denies violence against the individual. Nazansky's ideas, which shocked Romashov, are the ideas of individualism: man is "the king of the world, his pride and adornment", he can do anything. But this is not bourgeois individualism, based on contempt for people and the superiority of a strong personality, - this is a call for unity of equals in spirit, this is an optimistic faith in the capabilities of man and his future. These thoughts strengthen Romashov in his decision to leave the army, in his choice of inner freedom. But to carry out this decision is not so simple, it is not so easy to overcome the influence of the environment, inert and limited.
Romashov's quarrel with officers and Nikolaev is just an external reaction to emotional experiences, but it is because of her that events develop regardless of the will of the hero. And one more circumstance that did not allow Romashov to abandon the prejudices of the officer society - Shurochka, his love for her. Shurochka, a charming, selfish, outstanding nature, is a predator in her essence. She demands from Romashov to agree with generally accepted conventions for the sake of her goals - to break out of this environment.
Having bound him with moral obligations, she forces Romashov to fight and actually make a sacrifice. And Romashov makes this sacrifice for her for the sake of his love, for the sake of the prejudices of public morality, which the beloved woman shares. The duel in the hero's soul is decided in favor of a person who is free to choose a place in life, but in the real life of society, the environment wins over Romashov's "I". The price of the sacrifice made by the hero is immeasurable - this is his life, given in a duel for the sake of fulfilling the conditions of an officer's court.
So the second, more important for all rights reserved 2001-2005 writer, the semantic aspect of the title of the story is solved.
Need a cheat sheet? Then save it - " The meaning of the title of the story by A. I. Kuprin "Duel". Literary writings!>Compositions based on the work of the duel
The meaning of the name
The story "Duel" was written by A. And Kuprin in the late 19th - early 20th century. This period was characterized by the Russo-Japanese War and revolutionary sentiments in the country. Therefore, the story and the exposure of army life in it caused a storm of indignation and public outcry. The author showed not only the unattractive sides of the Russian army, with the orders of which he himself was well acquainted, but also put them on display. It was a real blow to army morals, so the story could not go unnoticed.
The protagonist of the work is a young second lieutenant Georgy Romashov. Compared to other officers, he was a more subtle, deep and sensitive person. It is believed that the author in Romashov depicted many autobiographical features and even considered him his double. The romantic aspirations of the hero were not suitable for barracks life. Romashov wrote stories from time to time, but, being a shy person, he did not show them to anyone. He considered army life vulgar and inhuman. He saw how hard it was for the soldiers, how often they were mocked, humiliated, and this upset him.
Like any romantic nature, Romashov knew how to love. The choice in the garrison was small, since most of the women were the wives of officers and were distinguished by vulgar manners. Rough, cutesy behavior and excessive coquetry repelled Romashov. Therefore, he chose Alexandra Petrovna, the wife of Lieutenant Nikolaev, as the subject of his admiration. She was strikingly different from those stupid seductresses. Shurochka was smart, talented, beautiful and seductive. However, there were other hidden features in her, for example, composure, ambition, deceit, prudence. Romashov did not see these qualities in her and therefore lost his most important “duel” - the duel with life.
The title of the story fully conveys the meaning of the drama played out in it. On the one hand, the duel is the logical conclusion of the conflict between Nikolaev and Romashov, on the other hand, the duel is Romashov's personal struggle with the sad reality and lawlessness of the army. The tragedy of this hero lies in the fact that, even realizing all the vulgarity and lack of spirituality of army life, he does not have enough strength to resist it. Therefore, in this situation, there is only one way out - death, which happens in the finale of the work. According to the official report of the regimental commander, Lieutenant Romashov was killed by Lieutenant Nikolayev during a duel.
The story “Duel”, created by Kuprin during the Russo-Japanese War and in the atmosphere of the rise of the Russian revolutionary movement, caused a huge public outcry, since it was in this relatively small work that the writer managed to expose and flaunt all those negative aspects of life, inviolable and deeply revered military caste, which has always been considered the advanced part of the autocratic Russian state.
Thus, with his “Duel” Kuprin dealt a stunning blow not only to the wild army mores, but to all the orders of tsarist Russia. By the way, for reading the story in Sevastopol, Kuprin was imprisoned, and then expelled from the Crimea.
But the problematic of the work goes far beyond the traditional military story. In the “Duel” the author touches upon topical issues of that time about the causes of inequality of people in society, highlighting the problem of the relationship between the individual and society, the intelligentsia and the people, and looking for ways to free a person from spiritual oppression, pointing out the insignificance and great harm of social influence on the formation personality.
In the center of the story is the fate of the honest and noble Russian officer Romashov (whose figure expressed many of the features of the author himself), who finds himself in the conditions of army barracks life, where he goes through a harsh school, feeling all the wrongness of human relationships. As the reason for the tragedy of the fate of the protagonist, we see the spiritual impassability of the intelligentsia, which has become detached from the people. Is unhappy love for Shurochka the cause of the spiritual and physical death of the morally pure Romashov and Nazansky? Of course not.
The personal tragedy in the lives of these heroes only accelerates the sad ending. No more than fifty pages are given directly to the barracks life in the story. These are two scenes depicting the everyday life of the regiment, a large review scene by the corps commander. But episodes showing the relationship between Romashov and his batman Gainan, episodes of conversations with the soldier Khlebnikov, sympathy for a Tatar who does not understand the Russian language are closely connected with them. It is here that the question of the attitude of the intelligentsia to the people is raised. The author shows the musty world of army provincial life.
Let us recall how, at the very beginning of the story, Commander Shulgovich subjects Romashov to house arrest for “misunderstanding of military discipline.” The hero feels humiliated, and his youthful vanity draws sweet pictures of revenge in his imagination: here he is graduating from the academy, becoming a brilliant officer, and Shulgovich fawns over him, whom he teaches how to maneuver. Then the war appears to him, and Romashov shows how a brave officer should be. But these are all just dreams, and reality is a dirty, abandoned town, boredom, limited and stupid officers, a poor and monotonous life, where only the station is one of the places where you can go to escape from the gray everyday life.
Vulgarity, rudeness and drunkenness among the officers, violence and cruelty towards the soldiers - all this destroys the positive in the heroes of the "Duel". It is the deep drinking bouts from boredom and gloomy service that push Romashov to where he should not have gone, that is, to the woman who will become the direct culprit of his death.
Romashov dies, on the verge of death Nazansky and other officers like them, who cannot escape from the cycle of regimental everyday life. All of them suffer from their own impotence, because, despite high personal and patriotic ideals, they are unable to change anything. Let us recall at least the words of Nazansky, in which faith in the positivity of a person and in female beauty, love and devotion sounds: “You should never make a person, even in thoughts, a participant in evil, and even more so in dirt. I think about gentle, pure, graceful women, about their bright tears and lovely smiles, about chaste mothers, about women going to death for the sake of love, about beautiful, innocent and proud girls with a snow-white soul.
The author allegedly gave Nazansky everything: intelligence, strength, beauty, an ardent desire for truth. It would seem that he should be a passionate fighter for human happiness, but, like Romashov, he goes with the flow, as a result, he withdraws into himself and loses all desire to resist reality. So the heroes do not find happiness and meaning in life. The officers are trying to escape from the petty-bourgeois quagmire, but most often these impulses end tragically (Captain Plum and Nazansky become drunkards, Romashov dies).
The title of the story is very symbolic, the reader learns about the real duel only from the epilogue, which contains an excerpt from the protocol of the duel between Romashov and Shurochka Nikolaev, from which it becomes clear that the hero was mortally wounded. Why does a hero die? For love? Hardly. Most likely, the duel is an attempt to actively protest, a manifestation of strong will and fearlessness, while the death of a hero is the only way not to put up with a disgusting life and leave it, remaining true to his ideal.
The duel is conceived by the author much more broadly: it is a duel of real love, sincere and vulgar, reduced to carnal satisfaction. A duel is a struggle of low, false, vain aspirations with pure, high and deeply moral impulses of the human soul.
But the main duel in the story is the duel of the writer himself with the harsh reality, with the unacceptable conditions of real life, which put pressure on a person, prevent him from being free, independent of circumstances, and, above all, maintaining his spiritual freedom.
The story expresses a person's attempt to actively resist, not to succumb to negative social influence and the structure of life in general, to remain faithful to himself, devotion to his ideals, to remain a humane, honest and spiritually elevated person.
But the fact is that Kuprin's main idea is to portray the tragedy and spiritually impotent intellectuals who did not want to put up with the vulgarity and stupidity of the army environment, who did not find the strength in themselves for social struggle. Their struggle is an unsuccessful attempt to overcome their own impotence, the realization of their own weakness and the inability to do anything.
Bibliography
For the preparation of this work, materials from the site http://www.coolsoch.ru/ were used.
Of course, there are exceptions. These people understand what kind of dirt they live in, but they cannot do anything. The same Nazansky - an interesting, thinking person - drank himself and ruined himself, seeing no other way. Kuprin protested in his book against the order existing in the army, which he knew firsthand. Romashov is drawn into this atmosphere (and what is left to do?), begins to lead the same image ...
However, it seems that the harsh social criticism of "The Duel" is a consequence, and not the cause of the deep, almost hopeless despair that reigns on the pages of the story. The symbolic title of the work - "the theme of the duel" runs through all Russian literature of the 19th century. However, in this chain, between the knightly duel between Petrusha Grinev and the slanderer Shvabrin in The Captain's Daughter (1836) and the senselessly cruel murder...
The explanation that the soldier does not know the Russian language is regarded as a gross violation of military discipline, which turns out to be incompatible with the principles of humanity and humanity. In general, there are many "cruel" scenes in Kuprin's story, depicting the humiliation of human dignity. They are characteristic primarily of the soldier's environment, among which the distraught, muzzled soldier stands out in particular ...
The richness of the language makes Kuprin one of the most widely read writers today. Many of his works have been staged and filmed; they have been translated into a number of foreign languages. The theme of love in the story "Garnet Bracelet" Unrequited love does not humiliate a person, but elevates him. Pushkin Alexander Sergeevich According to many researchers, “everything is masterfully written out in this story, starting with its ...
